top of page

USB v.s. WiFi

  • Writer: Ryan Chen
    Ryan Chen
  • 6 days ago
  • 3 min read
ree

When comparing local Wi-Fi to USB, it's important to consider both latency (the delay in data transmission) and bandwidth (the amount of data that can be transferred over a period of time). Here's a general comparison:


Latency


USB (Universal Serial Bus)

  • Lower Latency: USB connections generally have significantly lower latency compared to Wi-Fi. This is because USB is a direct, wired connection. Data travels along a dedicated path, with minimal processing or waiting time.

  • Typical Latency: For most USB versions (especially USB 3.0/3.1/3.2 and later), the latency introduced by the USB interface itself is often in the range of microseconds (µs) or very low single-digit milliseconds (ms). For high-speed applications like gaming peripherals (mice, keyboards), USB is crucial for responsiveness.

  • Factors Affecting USB Latency:

    • USB Version: Newer versions (USB 3.x, USB4) have improved protocols and higher speeds, which can also contribute to slightly lower effective latency.


    • Device Quality: The quality of the USB controller, cables, and the connected device itself can influence latency.


    • Polling Frequency: For some devices (like mice), the polling rate (how often the device reports its status to the host) impacts perceived latency.


Local Wi-Fi

  • Higher Latency: Wi-Fi inherently introduces more latency than wired connections. This is due to several factors:


    • Wireless Medium: Radio waves are less reliable than cables. Signals can be affected by interference, obstacles (walls, furniture), and distance, requiring retransmissions and error correction.


    • Half-Duplex Communication: Most Wi-Fi operates in half-duplex mode, meaning devices can either transmit or receive at any given time, but not both simultaneously. This "listen before transmit" mechanism adds overhead.


    • Shared Medium: All devices on a Wi-Fi network share the same airwaves. This leads to congestion, collisions, and the need for protocols to manage access, all of which add delay.

    • Processing Overhead: Wireless protocols involve more complex error checking, encryption, and routing compared to direct USB connections.

  • Typical Latency: Local Wi-Fi latency can range from a few milliseconds (ms) in ideal conditions (close to the router, no interference, modern Wi-Fi 6/6E/7) to tens or even hundreds of milliseconds in congested or poor signal environments. For online gaming, fluctuations in Wi-Fi latency (jitter) are particularly problematic.



Bandwidth (Data Transfer Rate)


USB

  • High and Consistent Bandwidth: USB offers very high theoretical bandwidth, which is typically quite consistent and less prone to external interference.

  • Typical Bandwidth (Theoretical Maximums):

    • USB 2.0: 480 Mbps (Megabits per second)


    • USB 3.0 (SuperSpeed): 5 Gbps (Gigabits per second)

    • USB 3.1 Gen 2 (SuperSpeed+): 10 Gbps


    • USB 3.2 Gen 2x2: 20 Gbps


    • USB4: Up to 40 Gbps (and potentially higher with Thunderbolt 4 compatibility)


  • Real-world performance will always be lower than theoretical maximums due to protocol overhead, device limitations (e.g., hard drive speed), and CPU processing. However, USB generally delivers a large percentage of its theoretical speed.


Local Wi-Fi

  • Variable and Influenced Bandwidth: Wi-Fi bandwidth is highly variable and significantly affected by numerous factors.

  • Typical Bandwidth (Theoretical Maximums - highly optimistic):

    • Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n): Up to 300-600 Mbps (single channel, depends on MIMO/antenna configuration)

    • Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac): Up to 1.3 Gbps (for multi-antenna configurations, can reach several hundred Mbps in typical real-world use)

    • Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax): Up to 9.6 Gbps (theoretical aggregate, real-world much lower, but better efficiency)

    • Wi-Fi 6E/7: Can reach even higher theoretical speeds (tens of Gbps) by utilizing wider channels and new frequency bands.

  • Real-world performance for Wi-Fi is often a fraction of the theoretical maximums due to:

    • Distance and Obstacles: Signal strength degrades significantly with distance and obstructions.


    • Interference: Other Wi-Fi networks, Bluetooth devices, microwaves, and even cordless phones can interfere.


    • Client Device Capabilities: The quality of the Wi-Fi adapter in your device matters.

    • Network Congestion: More devices on the same Wi-Fi network reduce available bandwidth for each.

 
 
 

Comments


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2023 by Ryan Chen.

bottom of page